Story Comments
Posted by: 1-2-Oscar 6 months, 2 weeks ago
This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
-
-

donald516 months, 2 weeks ago
Why? Because he didn't speak up while in office about all the frivolous Repug spending versus the increased debt? Heck, he knew he would have been fired like Lindsay, the Bush financial advisor fired for telling Dumya the Iraq war might cost 200 billion!
Had to neg ya, Oscar, but I gave you a reason! Also, Greenspan sure helped Clinton with 8 prosperous years, didn't he?
Reply-

Justice4All6 months, 2 weeks ago
The Fed does not answer to Bush. We can blame Bush for the state of the economy, but it was Greenspan who kept lowering interest rates to prop up the economy that Bush was destroying. The low interest rates eventually led to the mortgage crisis.
I have to agree with 1-2-Oscar, Greenspan is almost as responsible for the current economic situition as Bush.
Reply
-
-

bonaroo6 months, 2 weeks ago
1-2-Oscar
I agree. Greenspan should never have left interest rates so low for so long. I wonder, though, how much pressure he was under to do so from the other members.
Reply
-





Post Reply
You are not signed in to Propeller.com. Please sign in or sign up to post a reply.